22 April 2018
Home Page About Us Services Publications Links
VIEWS
TACY'S MEMO
Opinion
Analysis
NEWS
Mining & Exploration
Rough Trade
Polished Wholesale & Manufacturing
Retail
Governmental
Labs & Trade and Industry Bodies
Branding & Marketing
Legal
Financial
Diamond Pipeline
Statistics
ARCHIVE NEWS - PRE 2008
People
Regional Issues
Created Diamonds
Civil Society
Ethics
Development Issues
Conflict Diamonds
Auctions
Kimberley Process
DIAMOND INTELLIGENCE BRIEFS
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2017
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2016
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2014
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2013
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2012
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2011
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2010
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2009
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2008
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2007
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2006
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2005
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2004
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2003
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2002
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2001
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2000
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1999
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1998
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1997
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1996
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1995
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1994
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1993
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1992
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1991
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1990
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1989
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1988
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1987
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1986
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1985
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1984
TACY RESEARCH
Tacy's Reports
Tacy's Research
Tacy's Presentations
RESOURCE LIBRARY
Company Reports
Kimberley Process
NGO Reports
Government Reports
Conflict Diamonds
Producer Marketing Documentation
Trade Organization Guidance
Supplier of Choice
Legal Issues
LEGAL
Laws and Regulations
Court Documents
Anti-Money Laundering
Best Practice Principles
Compliance
Competition
Banking
FINANCE
Basel II
Compliance
Decisions
PICTURES
Botswana
De Beers Archive Pictures
Conference Photos
India
Zimbabwe
SITE MAP
MY ARTICLES
created by CyberServe
 Email this      Printer-Friendly Format    
CHINA HIT BY EBOLA 'AVERSON BEHAVIOR': DELEGATIONS FROM VIRUS-IMPACTED NATIONS NOT INVITED TO CHINA KPCS PLENARY
31 October 2014
CHAIM EVEN-ZOHAR

The Ebola "aversion behavior" has clearly hit China. In an unprecedented move, the People's Republic of China, which, as 2014 KPCS Chair, hosts the forthcoming KP Plenary in China, has pleaded with a number of African countries to "understand our difficulty as the host of the meeting and actively consider not participating."

In an October 29, 2014, letter to a number of countries, the KPCS Chair's office wrote: "as the host, China is making its all efforts to make the preparation for more than 300 International representatives. Currently, Ebola virus disease outbreak is rampantly continuing in West Africa and has transmitted to the region other than Africa, causing great concern to the international community. Many representatives have expressed to us their concern that whether there will be delegates from your country and expect us to do the prevention and control work to ensure the health and safety of all representatives."

The letter continues: "As a good brother, a good friend and a good partner of Africa, China has been making great efforts to assist African countries in response to the disease, and in the first time has provided three patches of emergency supplies, remittance and food aids. Meanwhile, holding a successful, safe and fruitful meeting is also due diligent responsibilities of China as the Chair for 2014. China has the obligation to convey to your and your friends the concerns and worries of other representatives. We hope you could fully understand our difficulty as the host of the meeting and actively consider not participating.

"To ensure the participation of your country, China welcomes the delegates from your embassy in China to attend the meeting. We would send a formal invitation to the Embassy in that case. Meanwhile, we will arrange audio and video communications in the Plenary Meeting. You'll be invited to join in the meeting in video conference way. Please also arrange a technical access from your country," says the letter from the KPCS Chair's office.

China Violates KPCS Core Agreement

The founders of the KPCS specifically considered the possibility that, for a variety of reasons, there might be a situation in which a Chair doesn't want to invite a member country. For that reason, Annex IV - "Administrative Matters" contains the provision (in Article 3): "Meetings are to be held in the country where the Chair is located, unless a Participant or an international Organisation offers to host a meeting and this offer has been accepted. The host country should facilitate entry formalities for those attending such meetings."

China is not allowed to selectively decide which member countries receive a visa - and which do not. If China cannot welcome all KPCS delegates, then it would be more appropriate to schedule the KPCS Plenary elsewhere or to cancel it altogether.

What makes the situation so precarious and painful is the fact that the KPCS was founded especially to improve the plight of the diamond areas in the very same countries that they are now "dis-inviting." While great international efforts are made to reduce the Ebola-related aversion behavior [see cover story in DIB 834], which will have a more damaging economic impact than the epidemic itself, it is quite unhelpful for China's KPCS Chair to add to these fears.

KPCS Plenary May Be ‘Deadlocked'

In an early reaction to the letter, DIB has learned that several of the dis-invited African countries are considering sending a local embassy emissary with very simple instructions: on every proposal or resolution that is put up for a vote, you raise your hand and say "no." As the KPCS governance is based on consensus decisions, this will ensure that without the appropriate African representation, no decisions will be made at the upcoming Guangzhou, China, plenary.

There is still time for diplomacy, and it is assumed that the last word hasn't been said about this.

   Back»