16 June 2019
Home Page About Us Services Publications Links
VIEWS
TACY'S MEMO
Opinion
Analysis
NEWS
Mining & Exploration
Rough Trade
Polished Wholesale & Manufacturing
Retail
Governmental
Labs & Trade and Industry Bodies
Branding & Marketing
Legal
Financial
Diamond Pipeline
Statistics
ARCHIVE NEWS - PRE 2008
People
Regional Issues
Created Diamonds
Civil Society
Ethics
Development Issues
Conflict Diamonds
Auctions
Kimberley Process
DIAMOND INTELLIGENCE BRIEFS
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2017
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2016
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2014
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2013
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2012
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2011
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2010
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2009
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2008
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2007
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2006
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2005
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2004
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2003
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2002
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2001
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2000
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1999
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1998
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1997
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1996
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1995
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1994
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1993
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1992
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1991
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1990
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1989
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1988
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1987
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1986
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1985
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1984
TACY RESEARCH
Tacy's Reports
Tacy's Research
Tacy's Presentations
RESOURCE LIBRARY
Company Reports
Kimberley Process
NGO Reports
Government Reports
Conflict Diamonds
Producer Marketing Documentation
Trade Organization Guidance
Supplier of Choice
Legal Issues
LEGAL
Laws and Regulations
Court Documents
Anti-Money Laundering
Best Practice Principles
Compliance
Competition
Banking
FINANCE
Basel II
Compliance
Decisions
PICTURES
Botswana
De Beers Archive Pictures
Conference Photos
India
Zimbabwe
SITE MAP
MY ARTICLES
created by CyberServe
 Email this      Printer-Friendly Format    
SHRENUJ RESPONDS TO ECONOMIC TIMES ARTICLE: ‘MISREPRESENTATION OF THE FACTS BY THE MEDIA’
07 July 2016
A recent article in India's The Economic Times reporting on the apparent financial difficulties of Indian diamond and jewelry manufacturing company Shrenuj & Co., has prompted a heated response by the company's Chairman Shreyas Doshi in a letter to the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange of India.

The news source reports that "Shrenuj has run into trouble...", and further reports that the company's banks, owed around US$450 million, have obtained  a court order to seize the company's inventory of diamonds and prevent travel of the company's top management outside of India without court permission.

The publicly listed company admits that one of its subsidiaries, Shrenuj Far East Limited, based in Hong Kong, which has a credit line of US$15 million with ICICI Bank Limited, has been placed in Receivership, with the ICICI's Hong Kong branch as Receiver. In his letter, Doshi asserts that, "[Shrenuj Far East Limited] forfeited all its assets to the Receiver and shared all the information with the Receiver on best effort basis." And further states that ICICI Bank had approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) in India and sought an ex-parte order to attach all the company's inventories in India and place restrictions on the international travel of the company's top management.

While the Economic Times article ambiguously links the DRT decision to the lending consortium - Bank of India, ICICI Bank, Punjab National Bank, State Bank of Patiala, Standard Chartered bank and Andhra Bank, and a number of others, Doshi says the action was undertaken unilaterally by ICICI Bank.

Doshi further clarifies that "...this action has reference to only one of the several banks lending to one of the smaller subsidiaries of the Company, and the operations of the Shrenuj Group or its listed flagship entity are not directly affected by this unilateral action by ICICI Bank Limited," adding that, "The Company is in the process of seeking legal opinion to challenge this ex-parte decision of DRT-III and take remedial measures."
   Back»