16 December 2017
Home Page About Us Services Publications Links
VIEWS
TACY'S MEMO
Opinion
Analysis
NEWS
Mining & Exploration
Rough Trade
Polished Wholesale & Manufacturing
Retail
Governmental
Labs & Trade and Industry Bodies
Branding & Marketing
Legal
Financial
Diamond Pipeline
Statistics
ARCHIVE NEWS - PRE 2008
People
Regional Issues
Created Diamonds
Civil Society
Ethics
Development Issues
Conflict Diamonds
Auctions
Kimberley Process
DIAMOND INTELLIGENCE BRIEFS
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2017
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2016
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2014
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2013
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2012
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2011
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2010
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2009
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2008
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2007
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2006
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2005
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2004
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2003
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2002
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2001
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2000
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1999
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1998
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1997
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1996
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1995
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1994
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1993
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1992
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1991
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1990
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1989
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1988
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1987
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1986
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1985
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1984
TACY RESEARCH
Tacy's Reports
Tacy's Research
Tacy's Presentations
RESOURCE LIBRARY
Company Reports
Kimberley Process
NGO Reports
Government Reports
Conflict Diamonds
Producer Marketing Documentation
Trade Organization Guidance
Supplier of Choice
Legal Issues
LEGAL
Laws and Regulations
Court Documents
Anti-Money Laundering
Best Practice Principles
Compliance
Competition
Banking
FINANCE
Basel II
Compliance
Decisions
PICTURES
Botswana
De Beers Archive Pictures
Conference Photos
India
Zimbabwe
SITE MAP
MY ARTICLES
created by CyberServe
 Email this      Printer-Friendly Format    
EC AUTHORIZES BELGIUM ‘CARAT TAX’; AWDC TO PROVIDE INFORMATIONAL SESSIONS
31 July 2016
The European Commission (EC) has issued a statement confirming that it has approved Belgium's request to implement a new income tax regime for the diamond sector, based on a fixed gross profit margin percentage, known as the "Carat Tax".

The EC's announcement notes that Belgium has committed to re-examine the fixed gross profit margin percentage at least every 5 years.

Following the EC decision, the Antwerp World Diamond Centre (AWDC) is organizing an informational session to communicate the details of the new legislation to the industry.

The AWDC says it will be holding two informational sessions, which will take place in the AWDC building in Antwerp. The first will be on Friday, August 5th, and the second on Friday, September 2nd. Those wishing to attend should register with the AWDC prior to the event.

Below is the text of the European Commission's press release announcing the approval of the new income tax regime.

European Commission - Press release

State aid: Commission authorises alternative income tax regime for wholesale diamond sector in Belgium

Brussels, 29 July 2016

The European Commission has found that Belgian corporate tax provisions applicable to the wholesale diamond sector were in line with EU State aid rules. The provisions do not selectively favour certain companies and therefore involve no State aid within the meaning of EU rules.

In May 2015, Belgium notified to the Commission plans to introduce a specific income tax regime for diamond traders to address specific difficulties in the application of the general income tax regime to the sector. The Commission's assessment showed that the measure, as amended by the Belgian authorities in the meantime, is designed in such a way that it minimises the possibility of selective advantages to certain companies in the wholesale diamond sector.

Under the general Belgian corporate tax system, a taxpayer's taxable income depends in the first place on the profit registered in the accounts. For wholesale traders in rough and polished diamonds, their profit depends largely on the value of the inventory of diamonds registered in their accounts. However, since the valuation of the stones requires significant expertise, it is difficult for the Belgian tax administration to assess and correct the value of diamond inventories through tax audits. Moreover, diamonds at wholesale level are bought and sold as commodities, which adds to the complexity of tracing individual stones in traders' accounts. As a result, there is often litigation between diamond traders and the tax administration, creating legal uncertainty.

The new specific income tax regime for diamond traders in Belgium (the "Diamond Regime") seeks to address this difficulty by introducing a method to calculate the income tax base of diamond traders that does not require the tax administration to review the valuation of diamonds in the traders' accounts. Under the Diamond Regime, the calculation of a trader's gross profit is based on a fixed percentage of turnover, which also results in a fixed calculation of the value of stones purchased and the variation in the inventory during the accounting period (cost of goods sold).

The Commission has assessed the measure under EU State aid rules to ensure that it does not unduly favour diamond traders over other businesses, which are subject to the normal income tax regime in Belgium. It also assessed whether the scheme favours certain diamonds traders within the wholesale diamond sector in Belgium. The Commission found that the Diamond Regime ensures that diamond traders pay their fair share of tax, while avoiding the tax inspection difficulties related to assessment of the inventories. It is in fact expected to increase the tax paid by the wholesale diamond sector. According to Belgium's estimates, the wholesale diamond sector is likely to pay at least €50 million more income tax every year, i.e. to pay more than three times the taxes it used to pay under the normal income tax regime.

Moreover, the regular checks and safeguards under the Diamond Regime further limit the possibility of undue advantages to diamond traders due to the special tax treatment. In particular, the new regime introduces a minimum tax base set at 0.55% of the trader's turnover. Belgium has committed to re-examine the level of the applicable gross profit margin percentage under the Diamond Regime at least every 5 years.

On this basis, the Commission has concluded that the Diamond Regime involves no State aid within the meaning of EU rules.
   Back»