19 November 2017
Home Page About Us Services Publications Links Forum
VIEWS
TACY'S MEMO
Opinion
Analysis
NEWS
Mining & Exploration
Rough Trade
Polished Wholesale & Manufacturing
Retail
Governmental
Labs & Trade and Industry Bodies
Branding & Marketing
Legal
Financial
Diamond Pipeline
Statistics
ARCHIVE NEWS - PRE 2008
People
Regional Issues
Created Diamonds
Civil Society
Ethics
Development Issues
Conflict Diamonds
Auctions
Kimberley Process
DIAMOND INTELLIGENCE BRIEFS
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2017
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2016
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2014
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2013
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2012
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2011
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2010
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2009
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2008
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2007
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2006
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2005
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2004
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2003
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2002
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2001
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2000
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1999
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1998
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1997
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1996
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1995
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1994
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1993
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1992
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1991
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1990
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1989
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1988
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1987
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1986
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1985
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1984
TACY RESEARCH
Tacy's Reports
Tacy's Research
Tacy's Presentations
RESOURCE LIBRARY
Company Reports
Kimberley Process
NGO Reports
Government Reports
Conflict Diamonds
Producer Marketing Documentation
Trade Organization Guidance
Supplier of Choice
Legal Issues
LEGAL
Laws and Regulations
Court Documents
Anti-Money Laundering
Best Practice Principles
Compliance
Competition
Banking
FINANCE
Basel II
Compliance
Decisions
PICTURES
Botswana
De Beers Archive Pictures
Conference Photos
India
Zimbabwe
SITE MAP
MY ARTICLES
created by CyberServe
 Email this      Printer-Friendly Format       Respond to this Article
AWDC REFUTES GLOBAL WITNESS ACCUSATIONS
12 September 2017
Following a report published on Monday this week by the NGO Global Witness, which claimed that European sanctions against Zimbabwe during the period December 2013 to September 2014 may have been violated, the Antwerp World Diamond Centre (AWDC) has issued a press statement denouncing the accusations.

The Global Witness report, entitled An Inside Job - Zimbabwe: The State, The Security Forces, and a Decade of Disappearing Diamonds, asks:

"Were EU Sanctions Violated By Antwerp Tenders? Global Witness believes the Antwerp World Diamond Centre (AWDC), the Antwerp Diamond Tender Facility (ATF), and First Element Bvba likely violated EU sanctions when facilitating the trade of Anjin's diamonds on at least three occasions between December 2013 and September 2014."

The full text of the AWDC press release follows below:

ANTWERP DIAMOND CENTRE DENOUNCES ACCUSATIONS: CONTROLS DID NOT FAIL

Antwerp, 11 September 2017 - The Antwerp World Diamond Centre denounces accusations made by Global Witness earlier today regarding three shipments of diamonds from Zimbabwe which were traded in Antwerp between December 2013 and September 2014.

According to Global Witness, European sanctions that are enforced against Zimbabwe may have been violated, because of the sale of three shipments of Zimbabwean diamonds in Antwerp, which may have indirectly benefitted the ZDI (Zimbabwe Defence Industries).

Global Witness claims ZDI may be shareholder of Anjin, the Chinese company that sold Zimbabwean goods in Antwerp.

Global Witness makes these claims based on a statement by the Zimbabwean State Secretary for Mines, Gift Chimanikire (MDC), in the Zimbabwean parliament in December 2012. The statement was dispelled a month later, by the Minister of Finance, Tendai Biti (MDC). The company Anjin itself was never on the European sanctions list.

The Antwerp World Diamond Centre, representing the Antwerp diamond industry, strongly denounces all the accusations made by Global Witness.

Ari Epstein, CEO AWDC: "When the European Union decided in September 2013, to lift the sanctions on Zimbabwe, AWDC took several initiatives before deciding whether or not the Zimbabwean goods could be traded on the Antwerp market:

  1. First and foremost AWDC initiated an investigation into the structures behind mining company Anjin and other mining companies active in Marange and Chimanimani. The results of this investigation revealed there was no indication that the legal entity ZDI was co-owner of Anjin.
  2. AWDC also requested the Kimberley Process, the collaborating organisation between industry, governments and NGO's, including Global Witness until 2011, whether or not diamonds, bought in Zimbabwe (Harare) were allowed to be imported under the existing KP conditions. The KPCS's response to this request was positive.
  3. The AWDC explicitly asked the European Union whether Zimbabwean goods could be imported to Antwerp and paid for. The European Commision responded positive to this inquiry.

Therefore, AWDC is convinced all due diligence was performed adequately with sufficient guarantees that only conflict-free diamonds, conforming fully with EU sanctions policies, were traded in Antwerp.

On a daily basis, some 550 shipments of diamonds are being processed in Antwerp. Despite the accusations made by Global Witness are unjust, it is correct that it is critical that each and every shipment is controlled in detail. These extensive controls are an absolute priority for Antwerp.
   Back»