19 November 2017
Home Page About Us Services Publications Links Forum
VIEWS
TACY'S MEMO
Opinion
Analysis
NEWS
Mining & Exploration
Rough Trade
Polished Wholesale & Manufacturing
Retail
Governmental
Labs & Trade and Industry Bodies
Branding & Marketing
Legal
Financial
Diamond Pipeline
Statistics
ARCHIVE NEWS - PRE 2008
People
Regional Issues
Created Diamonds
Civil Society
Ethics
Development Issues
Conflict Diamonds
Auctions
Kimberley Process
DIAMOND INTELLIGENCE BRIEFS
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2017
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2016
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2014
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2013
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2012
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2011
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2010
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2009
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2008
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2007
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2006
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2005
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2004
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2003
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2002
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2001
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2000
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1999
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1998
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1997
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1996
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1995
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1994
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1993
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1992
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1991
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1990
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1989
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1988
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1987
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1986
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1985
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1984
TACY RESEARCH
Tacy's Reports
Tacy's Research
Tacy's Presentations
RESOURCE LIBRARY
Company Reports
Kimberley Process
NGO Reports
Government Reports
Conflict Diamonds
Producer Marketing Documentation
Trade Organization Guidance
Supplier of Choice
Legal Issues
LEGAL
Laws and Regulations
Court Documents
Anti-Money Laundering
Best Practice Principles
Compliance
Competition
Banking
FINANCE
Basel II
Compliance
Decisions
PICTURES
Botswana
De Beers Archive Pictures
Conference Photos
India
Zimbabwe
SITE MAP
MY ARTICLES
created by CyberServe
 Email this      Printer-Friendly Format       Respond to this Article
JEWELERS OF AMERICA SUBMITS ARGUMENT ON SALES TAX FAIRNESS TO U.S. SUPREME COURT
09 November 2017
Jewelers of America (JA), the United States' national trade association for businesses serving the fine jewelry marketplace, has announced that it has joined a group of 10 retail trade associations that have filed an amicus brief to the United States Supreme Court in support of South Dakota's petition to the court to re-consider the Quill decision from 1992. That decision, explains JA, established the current system under which states are prohibited from collecting sales and use taxes from sellers that do not have a physical presence in-state, leading to the current uneven playing field between traditional and online sellers.

"This is a historic opportunity for our industry to stand up for sales tax fairness," says David J. Bonaparte, JA President and CEO.  "We are hopeful the court will take up the South Dakota case and recognize that Quill does not reflect the retail landscape that exists today."

South Dakota's petition was reportedly filed to the court in early October, after the South Dakota Supreme Court issued a ruling that the state's online sales tax law is unconstitutional.

In addition to Jewelers of America, the brief is being submitted by national trade associations whose members sell everything from furniture and lighting fixtures to textbooks and sporting equipment. The effort is being spearheaded by the Marketplace Fairness Coalition (MFC).

Jewelers of America supported the brief by providing stories and information from jewelers on how the practice of "showrooming" -- visiting a store in order to examine a product before buying it online at a lower price/without sales tax  - has had a negative impact on jewelry businesses.

While jewelers and other businesses are prepared to compete with online sellers when it comes to price, service and selection, the brief argues that they are being forced to compete on an uneven playing field.

"Simply put: sales tax differentials combined with a rise in mobile technology and e-commerce are putting local sellers out of business, emptying out the retail centers of our nation's towns and cities, destroying local jobs, and hurting small towns and communities," the associations state in the introduction to the brief.

The Court's current term began on October 2 and runs through June 2018, with the last day of oral arguments scheduled for April 25, 2018.
   Back»