12 December 2017
Home Page About Us Services Publications Links
VIEWS
TACY'S MEMO
Opinion
Analysis
NEWS
Mining & Exploration
Rough Trade
Polished Wholesale & Manufacturing
Retail
Governmental
Labs & Trade and Industry Bodies
Branding & Marketing
Legal
Financial
Diamond Pipeline
Statistics
ARCHIVE NEWS - PRE 2008
People
Regional Issues
Created Diamonds
Civil Society
Ethics
Development Issues
Conflict Diamonds
Auctions
Kimberley Process
DIAMOND INTELLIGENCE BRIEFS
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2017
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2016
Diamond Intelligence Briefing 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2015
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2014
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2013
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2012
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2011
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2010
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2009
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2008
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2007
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2006
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2005
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2004
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2003
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2002
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2001
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 2000
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1999
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1998
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1997
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1996
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1995
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1994
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1993
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1992
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1991
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1990
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1989
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1988
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1987
Diamond lntelligence Briefs 1986
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1985
Diamond Intelligence Briefs 1984
TACY RESEARCH
Tacy's Reports
Tacy's Research
Tacy's Presentations
RESOURCE LIBRARY
Company Reports
Kimberley Process
NGO Reports
Government Reports
Conflict Diamonds
Producer Marketing Documentation
Trade Organization Guidance
Supplier of Choice
Legal Issues
LEGAL
Laws and Regulations
Court Documents
Anti-Money Laundering
Best Practice Principles
Compliance
Competition
Banking
FINANCE
Basel II
Compliance
Decisions
PICTURES
Botswana
De Beers Archive Pictures
Conference Photos
India
Zimbabwe
SITE MAP
MY ARTICLES
created by CyberServe
 Email this      Printer-Friendly Format    
RJC RELEASES 2ND DISCUSSION PAPER ON CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY CERTIFICATION
26 September 2010

The Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) has released its second discussion paper on Chain-of-Custody Certification, for public comment. The purpose of this paper is to seek feedback on proposals for RJC to develop Chain-of-Custody Certification in the jewelry supply chain for diamonds, gold and platinum metals.

The proposed RJC Chain-of-Custody Certification System aims to enable businesses to demonstrate rigorous assurance for responsible supply chains. Importantly, it would allow for on-product RJC certification of tracked diamonds, gold and/or platinum metals in jewelry products for consumer sale. It is hoped that the RJC Chain-of-Custody Certification System could be launched in 2012.

Currently, RJC Member Certification enables claims about responsible business practices at the level of that business. RJC Chain-of-Custody Certification, when combined with RJC Member Certification, would enable product-related claims about responsible supply chains to be made to consumers.

By implementing chain-of-custody management systems, businesses could show their customers the provenance of the material in their products, including through voluntary use of the RJC Certified Product label.

The proposed RJC Chain-of-Custody Certification System represents the first attempt to develop a large-scale initiative of this scope for the jewelry industry, according to RJC. The certification system would encompass tracking of eligible material and conditions for responsible business practices, and would be applicable internationally and across the supply chain from production to retail. The requirements to achieve certification would not be prescriptive; businesses would establish their own management systems to suit the nature and scale of their activities and deliver the required performance. Businesses wishing to become certified would be audited by RJC-accredited, independent, third party auditors.

An initial draft Standard has been laid out in some detail, to help facilitate concrete discussion about design and implementation issues. The draft Standard aims to strike a balance between commercially realistic requirements and the critical objective of supply chain integrity.

The RJC says it welcomes input on how the proposal could be further improved and is providing a four month public comment period for stakeholder review of this paper, until 31 January 2011.

To read the discussion paper, click on the image below:

 

 

 

   Back»